Central connectors
People with many direct ties. They are often informal experts, valued for their knowledge and for knowing who knows what, but they can also become bottlenecks.

For organizations
Every organization has two structures: the one on the org chart, and the network of relationships through which work actually gets done. Organizational Network Analysis maps the second one, so you can see who people really turn to for information, advice and new ideas, and act on what you find.
Much of the information people need to do their job comes from other people: the colleagues they ask for advice, ideas, feedback or support. This network is the first place people look for knowledge, and the place they are most likely to find it. When it is missing the right connections, information stalls and good ideas get lost.
“Knowledge flows along existing pathways in organizations. If we want to understand how to improve the flow of knowledge, we need to understand those pathways.”
Larry Prusak
Organizational Network Analysis (ONA) applies the methods of social network analysis to organizations. An org chart shows how the organization is meant to work. A network map shows how it really works.
How work really happens: the patterns of interaction that never appear on the org chart.
The individuals, teams and units that hold central positions in the informal network.
Breaks in the flow of information, overloaded people, structural holes, and isolated people or teams.
Expertise and peer support that exist in the network but are not reaching the people who need them.
How information moves within and across functions, locations and hierarchical levels, and where it stops.
Where the informal organization matches the formal one, where it differs, and what that means for how work is organized.
Each network is defined by one kind of relationship, within teams, across functions and with contacts outside the organization. Together we choose the ones that matter for your goals.
Network patterns and individual measures bring out the people who matter most in the informal structure, whatever their formal position.
People with many direct ties. They are often informal experts, valued for their knowledge and for knowing who knows what, but they can also become bottlenecks.
People who link different groups, defined by function, location or level. They bring together different skills and know-how.
People who connect members of the same group who would otherwise not be in touch, keeping the whole network connected.
People with few or no ties, whose skills may not be fully used. They are often niche experts with important outside contacts.
A project can also go deeper into specific questions, such as:
Find the functions, teams and locations that rarely talk to each other, and the people who are overloaded or under-used, so information can flow more freely.
See whether informal networks are open or fragmented, and whether everyone has access to the relationships and information that matter.
Bring out the informal experts and influencers who drive problem solving and innovation but are not yet recognized by the org chart.
ONA projects are led by researchers of the Network Innovation Lab at SDA Bocconi School of Management and the Department of Management and Technology, Bocconi University, who study how networks shape performance and innovation.
Let's network
Tell us about your organization and what you would like to understand. We will get back to you to discuss the goals, the scope, the networks to map and the timing.
Contact us about ONAor write to research.sdabocconi@sdabocconi.it